Misquoting jesus rapidshare

I have opposed many of Ehrman's argument in print and will continue to do so. I will likewise oppose his opposition to what I understand to be the historic Christian faith. That does not, however, mean that my love does not extend to him as my neighbour in the global village, nor mean that I cannot thank God for Bart's humanity.

Ehrman, is that you sneaking in here again to see what we're up to? I simply find his historic reconstructions as well as the implications that he deduces from textual variants to suffer from some fundamental flawsinterpretations that move beyond what the evidence warrants. Just to avoid confusion Peter, I think you and I responded to the "Anonymous" posting at the same time.

My response above is to "Anonymous," not to your posting. Well, I am a different anon from the first commenter. As for a name, that might reveal too much. Just call me 'furrowed'. As for the substance at hand: I warm to the great love you have bestowed upon the now greatly loved Bart even if he is an anti-Christ.

And where is all this opposition to the GLB's many arguments in print? Furrowed, Try here , but there are many other points on this blog if you look through it. Most of that book is cut-and-pasted from public-domain reviewsand these cut-and-pasted portions are the best parts of the book. The abysmally low quality of the research, writing, and reasoning in that book was one of the main reasons that I wrote Misquoting Truth.

Don't think it mentioned Ehrman. I use the term 'print' to refer to publicly written pieces. However, whether something is in hard copy or not is largely immaterial.

Thanks for the clarificationyour article was in my files on Ehrman with reference to his claims on page 96 of Misquoting Jesus paperback edition that the variants in Matthew demonstrate scribal tendencies to turn implicit teachings in the text into explicit teachings. So I had identified it as a piece that dealt with Ehrman, even though it doesn't actually deal directly with Ehrman.

Perhaps that was part of the attraction of seeing if I could write something simultaneously true to my non-KJVO principles and able to be approved by them. Have you ever thought of putting in an article for them? Williams, How come you refused to write a book refuting Bart Ehrman? The most important factor in the decision was looking at all the commitments I already had and realising I could not take an additional one within the timescale required by the publisher. Please note that the tricks or techniques listed in this pdf are either fictional or claimed to work by its creator.

We do not guarantee that these techniques will work for you. Some of the techniques listed in Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why may require a sound knowledge of Hypnosis, users are advised to either leave those sections or must have a basic understanding of the subject before practicing them.

DMCA and Copyright : The book is not hosted on our servers, to remove the file please contact the source url. If you see a Google Drive link instead of source url, means that the file witch you will get after approval is just a summary of original book or the file has been already removed. Loved each and every part of this book.

I will definitely recommend this book to non fiction, history lovers. Your Rating:. Your Comment:. Ehrman Submitted by: Jane Kivik. Read Online Download.